Search for content in message boards

Citing for Sex

Replies: 5

Re: Citing for Sex

Posted: 1363091992000
Classification: Query
Edited: 1363092056000
I don't understand.

Here is an English census for a Mary Ann Hallock of London, England.

The fifth line from the top of the ancestry transcription shows she is a female. This is deduced from the fact that, in the original record, her age is in the female column. That sex is posted into FTM when the record is merged into FTM.

You shouldn't have to change anything - unless you know the sex is wrong. (And I have seen where the sex is wrong, particularly with children, but even occasionally adults). Then, the sex needs to be corrected.

Ancestry's treatment in censuses, whether US or UK, seems straightforward to me. I don't understand what problem you are having with ancestry's handling of it????

SubjectAuthorDate Posted
rdlomax 1363022402000 
silverfox3280 1363031170000 
rdlomax 1363088725000 
silverfox3280 1363091992000 
rdlomax 1363095147000 
silverfox3280 1363108503000 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic