Search for content in message boards

SURVEY - What facts do you feel comfortable merging from Public Member Trees?

Replies: 69

Re: SURVEY - What facts do you feel comfortable merging from Public Member Trees?

Posted: 1361299562000
Classification: Query
Don't know how many have implemented FAMily_asChild.STATus, but only one (that I know of) has the feature integrated into its export/import of a GEDCOM file.

So what I'm saying is not actually what you think I'm saying. Right now, FTM does not have a Child_Family_Status. But if you or someone asks to have this type of status implement, then be sure to say that the information needs to be implemented in the GEDCOM Import and Export correctly.

This is the same thing they refuse to implement regarding married name. I send a GEDCOM with a name.type of "married" and they drop the tag, so FTM never knows that I've given them a married name and they then generate a married name by using the spouses surname. Which in non-USA terms could be very wrong. I can go on and on about these things.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
silverfox3280 1361286635000 
RCanfield1962 1361325636000 
kj_norway 1361295082000 
silverfox3280 1361296408000 
kj_norway 1361299562000 
kj_norway 1361301836000 
KATHYMARIEANN 1361305612000 
kj_norway 1361307551000 
RCanfield1962 1361316598000 
kj_norway 1361214122000 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic