Search for content in message boards

SURVEY - What facts do you feel comfortable merging from Public Member Trees?

Replies: 69

Re: SURVEY - What facts do you feel comfortable merging from Public Member Trees?

Posted: 1361301836000
Classification: Query
Edited: 1361302111000
At this point most who are reading this thread are asking, "how does this relate to the initial question posed?"

The question was asked: "So how, in FTM, should we handle the "LINKING" of information found in the public tree to people in our FTM tree? "


My answer was in: 17 Feb 2013 12:38PM

I also talked about using the source quality field.

Rich was not 100% happy with that answer so he ask:
"I'd still would like to see another way to separate out potential leads vs confident sources."

One solution to that is the "STATUS" value of a Child=>Family connection.


Silverfox notes that he adds custom facts: "Link to Children", et el

I'm not 100% sure what this accomplishes. But one example he gave was "Link to Parents: John Doe named parents James & Sarah (Smith) Doe in death cert"

The GEDCOM standard says: Use the source_citation EVENt subtag noting death and a role subtag of "Parent"

So special/custom facts are not needed if FTM used what was created in the GEDCOM.

Yes the GEDCOM and FTM are two separate things but if you implement the underlying functions of GEDCOM then you would not need the custom facts.

That is my point!!!! Most software does not implement many of the low level little used subtags. But very often they implement something without thinking that it may have already been solved. Again this is my point!!
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
silverfox3280 1361286635000 
RCanfield1962 1361325636000 
kj_norway 1361295082000 
silverfox3280 1361296408000 
kj_norway 1361299562000 
kj_norway 1361301836000 
KATHYMARIEANN 1361305612000 
kj_norway 1361307551000 
RCanfield1962 1361316598000 
kj_norway 1361214122000 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic