Difference between revisions of "Talk:World Archives Project: South Australia, Australia, Police Gazettes, 1862-1926 (Part 2)"

From Ancestry.com Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Common Keying Errors Found by Reviewers)
(Questions and Answers)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
== Questions and Answers  ==
+
When this project first became available, prefix entries such as "Miss," "Private," "Sergeant," etc. were not available and thus came up as errors on either entry or upon review. I know see that those prefixes, as well as others, have been added as available, but no updates were announced. So, now when reviewers are adding those prefixes to records entered before any knowledge that the new prefixes are available, those entries are showing up as corrections and, thus, contributors are probably receiving poorer accuracy ratings. Is something being done to correct this situation?
 
 
<span style="color:orange">'''If you have a keying question that is not answered on the project page or in any of the information above, click “EDIT” and ask it here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.'''</span><br><br>
 
 
 
 
 
Q. Are we not to enter prefixes such as "Sergeant," "Private," etc? They are not recognized in the keying field for prefixes, although they have in other projects of this type.
 
 
 
A. No, only regular prefixes are to be keyed. When they want ranks keyed a separate field would be added to the project.
 
  
 
==Suggestions/Additions==
 
==Suggestions/Additions==

Revision as of 16:14, 1 March 2016

Feel free to add to or edit information in this discussion tab as necessary. Please take time to become familiar with the General Keying Standards and be sure to read all instructions on the main project page. (Please note that in case of a discrepancy, project level instructions always trump general keying standards.)

Extra Keying Helps


1. Often names are followed by the age in parentheses, eg JOHN SMITH (16), particularly for young offenders.

Common Keying Errors Found by Reviewers


1. Missing names of victims, relatives etc. within the article. Do not only key the criminal/perpetrator.

2. Not keying middle names or initials.

It is very important that images with the ACDB logo be marked as the ACDB form type.

44401.png










Only key the first alias listed. Do not create extra records/lines for multiple aliases.
Do not combine aliases when there are multiple, just key the first one.

Do not calculate ages from year of birth. If only a year of birth is noted leave the age field empty.


When this project first became available, prefix entries such as "Miss," "Private," "Sergeant," etc. were not available and thus came up as errors on either entry or upon review. I know see that those prefixes, as well as others, have been added as available, but no updates were announced. So, now when reviewers are adding those prefixes to records entered before any knowledge that the new prefixes are available, those entries are showing up as corrections and, thus, contributors are probably receiving poorer accuracy ratings. Is something being done to correct this situation?

Suggestions/Additions

If you have a suggestion or would like to make an addition to the project page, click “EDIT” and post your suggestion here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.

The phrase "as seen" should be removed from the instructions for keying Age to avoid confusion, as the age sometimes has to be converted to the required format. --Katerimmer (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2016 (MST)

A: The field has been updated. Thank you. Seanbmc (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2016 (MST)