Talk:World Archives Project: Mayflower, Deeds and Probate, 1600-1850
Feel free to add to or edit information in this discussion tab as necessary. Please take time to become familiar with the General Keying Standards and be sure to read all instructions on the main project page. (Please note that in case of a discrepancy, project level instructions always trump general keying standards.)
Extra Keying Helps
Common Keying Errors Found by Reviewers
Questions and Answers
If you have a keying question that is not answered on the project page or in any of the information above, click “EDIT” and ask it here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.</span
Q: In Deed Records how do you handle "John Bass to Home Savings Bank?" Do you key the company in the given name field?
Q: How do you key John Bass's wife? Mrs John Bass?
Q: In DEEDS I have come across one where land is divided up among a few people. Do we capture all the names just the first one(s) shown?
- A: Key all names directly involved in the process on both ends of the deal. Do not key any indirectly involved people, like witnesses. -- Kateshort2 06:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Q: In Deeds, I have "Heirs of John Tuttle" , the place, date, then list of heirs. Do I leave out John Tuttle and key all the heirs? Another Deed record, "Heirs of Josiah Allen to Ralph Allen". Do I key "heirs of" in suffix field?
Q: For Guardianship records, if the text starts out "Guardianship of Children of John Smith of Plymouth MA <Plymouth Co. PR #20001>" and later includes the names of the children, should the deceased parent's residence location (Plymouth, MA, in this case) be used for the children, or should Residence Location be left blank?
Q: Is it possible for a single paragraph in the image to be keyed as multiple records of different Event Types, e.g. if a "Will" record (key only the primary person) happens to mention the guardianship of the children, should the children also be keyed as Guardianship records (key only the named children)?
If you have a suggestion or would like to make an addition to the project page, click “EDIT” and post your suggestion here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.
|Event Type||Prefix||Given||Surname||Suffix||Alias Surname||Record Day||Record Month||Record Year||Record Place||Probate Year||Residence Location|
|Estate||John||Alden||17||Jun||1765||Windham, CT||[Blank]||Lebanon, CT|
|Will||Elizabeth||Alden||13||Dec||1784||Windham, CT||[Blank]||Lebanon, CT|
|Estate||James||Geer||8||Apr||1755||New London, CT||[Blank]||Groton|
|Estate||John||Seabury||Jr||15||Jan||1745||New London, CT||[Blank]||Groton, CT|
|Estate||Rev||Samuel||Seabury||10||Oct||1796||New London, CT||[Blank]|
|Estate||Jabin||Alden||9||Aug||1808||Windham, CT||[Blank]||Lebanon, CT|
|Will||Joseph||Hewitt||18||Nov||1784||Stonington, CT||[Blank]||Stonington, CT|
|Will||Jabez C||Chesebrough||30||Dec||1754||Stonington, CT||[Blank]||Stonington, CT|
|Estate||Thomas||Palmer||12||Dec||1752||New London, CT||[Blank]||Stonington, CT|