Difference between revisions of "Talk:World Archives Project: Bedfordshire, England, Workhouse and Poor Law Records"

From Ancestry.com Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Questions and Answers)
(Questions and Answers)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
Thank you
 
Thank you
 
Jan
 
Jan
 +
:A: As stated before, each image should be keyed without reference to the other. "Rejecting" an image set only applies when reviewing a set which someone has already keyed, if you decide that it needs to be rekeyed. If you don't feel that you can key a particular image set, just cancel it with "I do not wish to complete the image set at this time". You can't cancel one image only out of a particular image set. --[[User:Katerimmer|Katerimmer]] ([[User talk:Katerimmer|talk]]) 16:51, 21 June 2017 (MDT)
  
 
==Suggestions/Additions==
 
==Suggestions/Additions==

Revision as of 15:51, 21 June 2017

Copy and paste this into the discussion tab of the new wiki you just created:

Feel free to add to or edit information in this discussion tab as necessary. Please take time to become familiar with the World Archives Keying Standards and be sure to read all instructions on the main project page. (Please note that in case of a discrepancy, project level instructions always trump general keying standards.)

Extra Keying Helps


Common Keying Errors Found by Reviewers


Do not infer gender from first names only. Gender should only be entered if there is a mark in a Gender column or it is confirmed by other words such as his, her, widow, widower.

Exemplified Records - These printed records are given as examples of how to fill the forms in - some keyers are actually keying them. They should be marked as Cover Page.

One Admission Form has a column headed "Where he slept last night". (It's example 8 in the Keying Examples on the Wiki.) A number of keyers are entering it as the person's residence, which it isn't.

Questions and Answers

If you have a keying question that is not answered on the project page or in any of the information above, click “EDIT” and ask it here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.

Double Pages

Very often the two images are related to one another, and they appear as the right hand page first and the left hand page will be the following one.

I have had to return a few of these and remarked in the comments boxes on returning.

Is there any way of overcoming this?

Thanks

Shirli

A: Each image should be indexed separately, regardless of what is on the other image in the image set. Have a look through the sample images and the instructions on the wiki page, especially the instructions about line numbers for the Indoor Relief Record form type. --Katerimmer (talk) 01:49, 8 June 2017 (MDT)

I've had a number of unrelated images also, however, often it is impossible to key at least one page with any accuracy as not only is there no name but often no parish details or other that can be relied upon when the images start with the right hand page of a previous entry. Is it possible to reject one page and key the right hand page of a new entry only or do I need to reject the set? Thank you Jan

A: As stated before, each image should be keyed without reference to the other. "Rejecting" an image set only applies when reviewing a set which someone has already keyed, if you decide that it needs to be rekeyed. If you don't feel that you can key a particular image set, just cancel it with "I do not wish to complete the image set at this time". You can't cancel one image only out of a particular image set. --Katerimmer (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2017 (MDT)

Suggestions/Additions

If you have a suggestion or would like to make an addition to the project page, click “EDIT” and post your suggestion here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.

I would like to suggest that for any similar future projects, Spouse Age should be added, perhaps to replace Spouse Suffix, as it would be much more useful for researchers. --Katerimmer (talk) 12:59, 7 March 2017 (MST)

And another suggestion - have Line Number automatically increase by 1 for each record keyed. This has been done on previous projects so I know it is possible.--Katerimmer (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2017 (MST)

Can I suggest inclusion of Maiden Name in future? Thanks.