|
A Cite for Sore Eyes: Citing Electronic Sources Why We CiteAs the detectives of our family histories, we have accepted a responsibility in our research which goes beyond merely finding our ancestors. Besides the finding, there is the recording of what we have discovered about our forebears. It is within the recording portion of our efforts that we have a serious responsibility: to provide quality citations for the sources in which we find information about our ancestors. As family historians, we accept this responsibility for two reasons. The first is purely for our own benefit. A properly written source citation for a piece of genealogical information helps us remember where we originally found it. This can save us from performing redundant research in a source which we've already consulted. Source citations can also assist us in considering additional avenues of research when we've turned up something new. We don't just cite our sources for ourselves. The second reason for citing our sources properly is for the benefit of others. The family history which we create should include source citations so that others interested in our genealogical information can judge the accuracy of our research for themselves. The future researchers of our genealogy-that one grandchild, niece, or fourth cousin who shares our passion for the hobby-will need to know "how you know" that Aunt Edith was really born during the 1932 World's Series. Besides our posterity, contemporary researchers with whom we share our information have the same need to verify the facts which we have gathered and organized. If we share the results of our research, others must be able to judge the craftsmanship of our efforts by the quality of our source citations. Citing Electronic Sources
Elizabeth Shown Mills, long-time editor of the National Genealogical Society's NGS Quarterly, has authored a book titled Evidence! Citation & Analysis for the Family Historian (noted in Book View in the January/February issue of Ancestry). This book was a much-needed addition to the literature of proper genealogical documentation. It includes a discussion of the fundamentals of both citation and analysis of genealogical source material. The book concludes with extensive examples of source citations for genealogical source materials of all types and media. While noting that agreement on the "proper" method for citing the new electronic sources has not yet solidified, Mills recognizes the need we have as active family historians to make quality source citations now, even in the face of uncertainty regarding their correct format. She provides citation examples for the new electronic sources, including electronic mail, Web pages, CD-ROMs, and mailing lists. The remainder of this article will discuss the formats for these four common types of sources. The examples given come directly from Evidence! They are Mills's examples of primary citations for endnotes or footnotes. The book also provides formats for subsequent citations and for bibliographic entries for the same sources, which are not reproduced here. Web Pages
The second challenge stems from the impermanence of Web pages. Changes to a Web page can be uploaded in a matter of minutes, meaning that what you viewed on a particular Web page today may be changed by tomorrow. Because of this, it is critical to note the date on which you viewed the Web page to obtain the information cited. Mills suggests including this date at the end of the citation. The "Minshew data" referred to in the example below is the surname which was searched for on the Texas State Library's online index to Confederate pension records. Index to Texas Confederate Pension Records, Archives Division, Texas State Library, online http://link.tsl.state.tx.us/c/compt.html, Minshew data downloaded 16 November 1996. Electronic Mail
Christopher Nordmann, "Rochon Baptisms of Mobile: Translated Abstracts," e-mail message from 104274.1313@compuserve.com (2767A Mary Avenue; St. Louis, MO 63144-2725) to author, 12 January 1997. Mailing Lists
In the example below, Mills includes the date on which the message cited was printed out. This printout date is not really necessary. Once a message is sent to a mailing list, the author of the message does not have the ability to change the message copies which were sent to other mailing list subscribers. Therefore the date required for the citation of a mailing list message is the date on which it was sent to the mailing list by its author-its creation date. Daphne Gentry (Library of Virginia, Richmond), unidentified "report" quoted at length by Jon Kukla, in "Virginia Personal Property Tax Records as a Research Source," Jon@HNOC.ORG, listserve message to IEAHCNET list IEAHCNET@H-NET.MSU.EDU, 18 November 1996. Printout dated 22 November 1996. CD-ROMs
Nicholas Shown entry, FamilyFinder database, Family Tree Maker, CD-ROM (Fremont, California: Banner Blue Software, 1994), citing Archive CD-153 (Orem, Utah: Automated Archives, no date). This data set is based on the census-index series compiled by Ronald V. Jackson et al. (Salt Lake City [and elsewhere]; Accelerated Indexing Systems, 1970s-1980s). Citations in the Electronic Age
Mark Howells is a Certified Information Systems Auditor and a Certified Information Systems Security Professional. He volunteers on the Internet as the host of the Norfolk-L genealogy mailing list and is chairman of the Internet Branch of the Norfolk Family History Society (http://www.oz.net/~cyndihow/). His e-mail address is markhow@oz.net.
Terms & Conditions |
Privacy Statement |
About Us |
Partner with Us |
Contact Us |