You are here: Learn > The Library > Columnists > "Along Those Lines"

"Along Those Lines"
10/26/2001 - Archive


A Focus on Family Photographs
In most parts of the Northern Hemisphere, it is autumn, the weather is getting chillier, and we're already preparing for our winter projects. Readers in the Southern Hemisphere are looking forward to springtime and the opportunity to once again get outside and enjoy outdoor activities. Regardless of where you are, you probably share two of the most universal pastimes: genealogy and taking photographs.

Photography is a multi-billion dollar business worldwide. Breakthroughs in technology in the last twenty years have allowed those of us involved in family history research to record the physical evidence of our lineage while creating and preserving new memories. Affordable 35mm cameras, high-speed films, disposable cameras, video camcorders, computers, CD-ROM burners and drives, scanners, digital cameras, and software programs provide us with excellent tools with which to capture, store, and reproduce photographic images. What a wonderful age we live in! No more standing or sitting rigid and smile-less while the photographer poses you for a long exposure and uses explosive flash powder. We live in a digital-point-and-shoot-and-transfer-to-disk era.

In "Along Those Lines . . ." this week, let's focus on family photographs, and examine some ways to record, identify, and preserve those wonderful images. I'll also include a few reference books for you, and this week's Citation Corner will focus on citing photographs.

Recording the Images
The digital era provides us with a number of methods for recording the images we already have or that we want to capture. If you're like me, you want flexibility and options. I attended a wonderful family reunion on 13 October and took with me two types of camera. The first is a digital camera. Prices on these cameras have dropped substantially in the last 2-3 years, and you can now buy a good one for less than $200. (I urge you to do your research on the Internet and then comparison shop online, where you can definitely save lots of money. I saved almost $70 on my Fuji camera purchase!) The second was a disposable 35mm camera with a built-in-flash, geared to both indoor or outdoor use.

The digital camera provided me with immediate gratification. I could tell whether I had a good shot or not. When I returned home, I was able to transfer the digital images to my computer, edit and crop them, and store them on my hard disk. I also embedded some of them in my genealogy database program and printed a few on photographic paper. While you may think this is "the" way to go, don't be so certain. That photo paper is not always as economical as you might think.

The disposable camera provided me with a lot of flexibility. While I didn't know for certain if the pictures were 'perfect' at the time, they were cheap. The cost of the 24-exposure disposable Kodak 35mm camera was purchased on sale for less than $5.00. The cost of Kodak processing, two sets of 3" x 5" prints, and a 3.5" photo disk, was $16.73. I now had the digital images, plus two complete sets of prints, and the total cost was less than the price of one package of photographic photo paper for my inkjet printer.

For existing photos, you may be considering the use of a scanner. Seven years ago I purchased a Hewlett-Packard color scanner for $995.00, a real deal at the time, and a graphics software program for $75.00. A good-quality flatbed color scanner (including software) can now be purchased at Best Buy for as little $49.95 and, after a manufacturer's rebate, can cost you even less. Chances are that the scanner can also perform as a photocopier, too. How can you lose?

Scan those old photographs into your computer and work with them to enhance them. Store them, embed them in your genealogy database, e- mail them to family and friends, and print them on plain paper, on acid-free archival paper, or on photographic paper. You might decide use your CD-ROM burner to create a CD with images for other family members. You might also consider creating a free, private family Web site at MyFamily.com (www.myfamily.com), and uploading your family pictures there to share with other family members you invite to view the site. Talk about flexibility!

Identifying the Images
You probably have a collection, as I do, of "the unknowns." These are the people whose photographs reside in a box, a file, or elsewhere, and you do not know their names. You don't dare throw the pictures away; they might be relatives you will identify later. However, you probably just haven't figured out how to do it. Well, I'm here to tell you to get on the stick!

You certainly can do your own research and try to determine who these people are, using the photographs themselves as clues. If you have old photographs mounted on various types of card stock, the cards themselves can be used to help date the picture. Various card stock, edging, decoration, and other peculiarities were used at different periods. Daguerrotypes, cabinet cards, and cartes-de-visite are among the numerous types of photographs that can help you date old pictures. Also, look for the name and location of the photographer for clues. Check the backs of photographs for clues to dates and locations, even pictures that are already framed. Karen Frisch- Ripley's book, "Unlocking the Secrets in Old Photographs," is one of a number of excellent reference books on the subject.

Consider, too, the clothing that the subjects wore. Clothing fashions can be indicative of the time of the photograph, especially in the 19th and early 20th Centuries, when people tended to dress in their best clothes to sit for photographic portraits. Priscilla Harris Dalrymple's book, "American Victorian Costume in Early Photographs," is a great primer on the subject and contains scores of photographic illustrations and comments.

Another vitally important way to identify people in old family photographs is by seeking input from other family members. Too many researchers neglect this essential step. Let me give you two personal examples.

First, I took two photos to the family reunion I mentioned and asked two of my first cousins, once removed, if they could identify any of the three subjects in one of the pictures. One cousin is eighty-four and the other is seventy-eight. The older one immediately recognized all three people in the picture, and the younger one only recognized only one of the three.

Second, in my new book, Your Family Reunion: How to Plan It, Organize It, and Enjoy It, there is a photo of "unknowns" on page 109 who obviously have been playing baseball. At the time I wrote the book, I could not specifically identify any of the people. However, I recently sent a copy of the book to another cousin, and just received a letter identifying three of the people as being his father, my grandfather, and my great-grandfather -- the first picture I've ever seen of him.

Therefore, I suggest you send a photocopy or a printed scanned image of your own "unknowns" to relatives, along with an SASE (self-addressed, stamped envelope), and ask for their help in identifying the people in the pictures. This may solve some mysteries as well as unlocking new doors.

Preserving the Images
Make sure, whatever you do, that your pictures are printed on acid- free archival papers, and store them in an archival quality box or album. If a product doesn't say it is archival quality, free of acid and lignin, don't assume it is. There are many photo boxes being sold that are not archival safe. Also, make sure that mats, linings, and filler cards in picture frames likewise are archival quality. You want to preserve these photographs for posterity, and acidic papers can cause the beginnings of decomposition that does not stop, even when removed from the acidic conditions. Be careful with your treasures.

Happy Hunting!
George

Citation Corner
If you are citing a photograph as a source of information, you still need to create a citation that includes WHO, WHAT, WHEN and WHERE. A wedding photograph of my maternal grandparents might be cited as follows:

Weatherly, Walton C. and Elizabeth Holder wedding photograph. 16 September 1908, Rome (Floyd) Georgia. Owned 1999 by Carolyn Penelope Weatherly, 1025 Tarleton Avenue, Burlington, NC 27215.

Citations for the three books referenced in this column follow:

Dalrymple, Priscilla Harris. American Victorian Costume in Early Photographs. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. 1991.

Frisch-Ripley, Karen. Unlocking the Secrets in Old Photographs. Salt Lake City, UT: Ancestry, Inc. 1991.

Morgan, George G. Your Family Reunion: How to Plan It, Organize It, and Enjoy It. Orem, UT: Ancestry Publishing. 2001.


  Printer Friendly
 
E-mail to a friend

Search The Library