You are here: Learn > The Library > Columnists > GC Extra

GC Extra
10/11/2001 - Archive


Image Searching on the Web
Several of the more popular Internet search engines now offer the ability to search for images on the Web. You always could search for images if you entered an image name, but what you would get back would be a list of pages containing an image with that name. The feature I find intriguing on these search engines is that now you can search specifically for images and the results returned show the image as well. This can be very useful if you’re looking for a specific image and you know what it looks like, or if you’re just looking for an image and don’t want to spend the time clicking on each link to visit the sites for a glimpse of the image. Many times in the past when I’ve searched for images the links had dried up long ago and the search was very frustrating.

I’ve tried three different search engines’ image search with very different results:

Dogpile at www.dogpile.com; Google at www.google.com; and AltaVista at www.altavista.com. I have had the most success with Google as far as the quality and quantity of images returned.

So why would you want to look for images on the Web? I can think of a few reasons.

1. You’re putting together your family history and you want to illustrate an idea or an event in the story. For instance, if your ancestor was a mariner, you might want to find drawings of nineteenth-century ships to add color to your narrative. In this case, you might search using keywords such as “barque”, “tall ship”, “schooner”, or “sailing ship”. I tried these keywords as searches on the three sites above and all returned possible hits, except Dogpile came up negative on the term “sailing ship”. If you find an image that you’re interested in, remember to visit the site where you found it and ask permission to use the image. Most images on the Internet are protected by Copyright laws and are not ours for the taking. You may not be granted permission to use the image and if that’s the case, try a different image.

2. You’ve previously seen an image that you’re interested in and can’t remember where you saw it. If you can narrow down a name for the image, you might be able to find it on the Web using one of these search engines. The name is key in these searches because that’s what the search engine searches. The hits aren’t always exact. For instance, knowing that I have a picture of myself on one of my Web pages, I wanted to see if I could find the image with these search engines. The image is called “liz.jpg”. I entered that term into each search engine’s image search option and came up with plenty of liz’s, but the only one that had my image was Google—and I didn’t find it until the forty-first screen! Google seemed to be more exact in its search. The hits returned for many screens were exactly as I had typed in the search term. The other two search engines returned hits that contained “liz” and were JPG images, but many were not just “liz.jpg”.

3. Curiosity causes you to search the Web to see if there’s images of any of your relatives out there. Since Kerstens is an unusual surname, I tried that name as a keyword on the three search engines. AltaVista returned no hits. Dogpile and Google both returned different hits and, interestingly enough, my image discussed above showed up on the first screen in Google–not because of the image name, but because it’s contained on a page called “kerstens.htm.” So you might get surprising results doing a search this way for relatives instead of using the customary search engines. I didn’t recognize any of the people that were in these images, but if I were to try a different, more common name, I might have better results with more hits to look through. I did enter “kelley” (my maiden name) and received way too many hits to look through.

The next time you have a few minutes to wander the ‘Net, try looking for some images using these or other search engines that allow you to see the image as part of the results. You may find just what you’re looking for, or you may be surprised to see what’s out there.



Elizabeth Kelley Kerstens, CGRS, CGL, is the managing editor of
Genealogical Computing, editor of the Board for Certification of Genealogists’ newsletter OnBoard, the creator of Clooz—the electronic filing cabinet for genealogical records, co-creator of the new family health history program GeneWeaver, and a frequent contributor to Ancestry. She can be reached via e-mail at gceditor@ancestry.com.


  Printer Friendly
 
E-mail to a friend

Search The Library