|
Ancestry Daily News
8/31/2007 - Archive
Ancestry Weekly Journal, 03 September 2007
Ancestry Weekly Journal
|
|
|
"A mind always employed is always happy. This is the true secret, the
grand recipe, for felicity."
~ Thomas Jefferson
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Using Ancestry: Exact Search
by Juliana Smith
In last week's newsletter, I began a series of articles that will
take a look at the various search options available at Ancestry. This
week's installment will focus on Exact Search. The Exact Search stands in stark contrast to the Ranked Search, which
we discussed last week.
Where the Ranked
Search is a bit "fuzzy," the Exact Search is precise. It does exactly
what we tell it to do--much like we'd all like our children to
behave!
The danger here is that one piece of information not entered exactly
as it appears in the database can throw the whole search. With Exact
Search, less is more--the less information you add, the more hits you
get. That's why it's best when doing an exact search, to
start with just a few basic facts and then narrow your search slowly
until you get a manageable number of hits. Rotate in and out
different pieces of information, based on which search terms are more
or less likely to be correct. For example, a given name is probably
less likely to be misinterpreted by a transcriber than a surname,
particularly an uncommon surname.
How Do I Do an Exact Search?
To start an Exact Search, simply check the box at the top of the
search template that says, "Exact Matches Only." As I mentioned last
week, you want to be aware what type of search you're performing
because this option is "sticky"--it will default to the last search
type you used. I try to make it a habit when I'm entering my search
criteria to double check and make sure I want the type of search that
is selected. Sometimes I swear gremlins come in and change it on me.
Exploring the "Less is More" Concept
To illustrate the "less is more" concept, let's do a "play-along
search" like the one we did last week. From the Advanced Search page, enter:
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
John Szucs, born in 1906 in the U.S.A. in Ohio
All of these records pertain to my grandfather. There are two census
records for him living in Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio; his death
record; and a passenger arrival record showing him and my grandmother
returning from an anniversary trip to Europe.
Now just for the heck of it, let's add his county of birth--Jefferson
County. Since I know that's where he's born, that can only help,
right? Wrong. Adding Jefferson County eliminates all of the hits
except his death record. Why? Because none of the other records index
the birth county. The census will show the county he lived in for
those years, but they only give the state in which he was born.
Making Exact Search More Flexible
There are several ways we can make the Exact Search more flexible.
First, you could de-select the "Exact" box only on certain fields,
but this will take you back into the world of Ranked Search, where
you'll see the results ranked by best match again, rather than the
list of hits by database that you see when you do an Exact Search.
There is also a Soundex option available from the homepage that is
only available when you have the "Exact Matches Only" box checked.
(When you're doing a Ranked Search, it will automatically include
Soundex options, as well as some other name variations.) Soundex is
also available on many of the individual database search pages as
well.
Let's do another "play-along" example, using the same gentleman I
used in last week's article--my great-grandfather, Raymond Dyer. On
the homepage, enter,
Raymond Dyer, Soundex (from the drop-down box that follows the name),
lived in U.S.A. and New York.
Last week with one Ranked Search we were able to locate Raymond in
four of the six enumerations that he was alive for and that are
currently available--1880, 1910, 1920, and 1930. With this one other
search using Soundex, we pick him up in the remaining censuses--1870
and 1900. In 1870, his last name was indexed as Dyre, and in 1900 it
is listed as Dyar.
Soundex Tip: Check the Soundex codes for common variations you've
found for the surname you are researching so you know that your
Soundex Searches are covering all the bases. For example, my great-
grandfather's last name appears on Mekalski on some records, and as
Menkalski. I believe that the name was spelled with a diacritic over
the e, which according to "First Names of the Polish Commonwealth" by
William Hoffman and George W. Helon, the nasal "e" with the diacritic
sounds like "en." Checking the codes for these two variations, I find
that Mekalski is coded M242 and Menkalski is M524. Because of the
different codes, a Soundex Search for Mekalski wouldn't turn up
variations of Menkalski, so I'd have to do two searches to capture
both. It's a good idea to keep a list of name variations and the
corresponding codes handy, so that you don't miss any during your
searches. You can get Soundex Codes for names by using the RootsWeb
Soundex Converter.
Wildcard Searches
Another way to loosen up Exact Searches is with wildcards. Ancestry
currently allows for the use of either an asterisk (*) or question
mark (?) in searches, although at present, neither can be used within
the first three letters of the name. (Searches of that magnitude
would eat up bandwidth slowing down or blocking searches for other
users significantly.) The asterisk replaces anywhere between zero to
six characters, and the question mark replaces one character. Since
the asterisk would clearly cover instances where one character was
misinterpreted, that's the most commonly used wildcard, but if you
were getting too many hits returned with a search, you might try the
question mark to narrow that down a bit.
As an example, let's use Mary Tob*n, born 1772 and since Mary liked
to lie about her age, let's give her a wide berth and also add some
flexibility to the date field by selecting "+/ – 10" years. This
finds my fourth great-grandmother in the 1850 and 1870 censuses, and
her passenger arrival record as well. The variant spellings it picked
up included the original spelling of Tobin, as well as Toban, Toben,
and Tobbin.
In my example, by simply de-selecting Family Trees from the box at
the bottom, I was looking at the first four results being the census
records of Raymond Dyer for 1880, 1910, 1920, and 1930. Not bad for
only filling out one search form.
Next Week
Next week, we'll continue our look at searching options at Ancestry
by getting a little closer to the databases, which allows us to
really unleash some of the power behind Ancestry searches. Juliana Smith has been an editor of Ancestry.com newsletters for more than eight years and is author of The Ancestry Family Historian's Address Book. She has written for Ancestry Magazine and wrote the "Computers and Technology" chapter in The Source: A Guidebook to American Genealogy, rev. 3rd edition. Juliana can be reached by e- mail at Juliana@Ancestry.com, but she regrets that her schedule does not allow her to assist with personal research.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
The Joys of Genealogical Collaboration!
(Or, Brisco Holder is Found!)
by George G. Morgan
You never know where the next clue in your genealogical odyssey will
appear. Sometimes, if you're like me, you take the information
provided by the only resources you have--family stories and
traditions--and run with them. After a while, though, you begin to
think that someone threw you a curve ball, perhaps inadvertently or
perhaps not. You reexamine everything you have and then try to make
some sense of it. When it doesn't make any more sense than it did
before, this is called a BRICK WALL! I know that I've had any number
of them, and that most of them have been cracked, broken, demolished,
and/or swept away through collaboration with other researchers.
I have been seeking the details about my great-uncle Brisco Holder
for more than twenty years. I have searched census records, posted
messages on message boards and mailing lists, searched in libraries
and archives, and tried in vain to research the veracity of family
stories. All of this has been to no avail--until recently. Let me
share the story as briefly as I can.
The Family Story
Regular readers of my columns, magazine articles, blog, and listeners
to The Genealogy Guys Podcast have often heard me talk about my
great-grandfather, Green Berry Holder. Following his service in the
Confederate Army, he and his older brother walked in 1865 from
Appomattox Courthouse in Virginia back to their family home near
Lawrenceville, Gwinnett County, Georgia. Before the end of the year,
the brothers and their parents had relocated westward to Lindale, in
Floyd County, Georgia. On 27 December 1866, Green Berry married
Ansibelle Penelope Swords. (The Floyd County Marriage Book, Vol. A,
Page 347, # 1359) incorrectly lists her name as A. P. Sanders, and I
have been able to disprove that with other sources!)
Green Berry and Penelope Swords Holder relocated in the mid-1880s to
a new home in Rome, Georgia. Green Berry became a well-respected
businessman, board member of two banks, a commodities and real estate
speculator, and two-time Representative to the Georgia House.
Throughout their years together, Penelope and Green Berry produced a
fine family! Their first of six sons was born in January of 1868; the
first of their six daughters was born in July of 1872. Their last
child, a daughter, Elizabeth Holder, was born on 19 July 1885. She
was my maternal grandmother.
Brisco Washington Holder was the fifth son born, according to his WWI
draft registration record at Ancestry, on 26 March 1877. I am still
seeking more information about him, but I know that he was still in
Rome, Floyd County, Georgia, at the time of the election of 1906 and
cast his vote, ostensibly for his father's candidacy for his first
term in office in the Georgia House of Representatives. However, it
must not have been much later that a problem developed.
According to accounts from my mother and her sister, which they heard
from Great-Aunt Emma Dale Holder, Green Berry Holder and Brisco
Holder had an argument following Brisco's "mistreatment of his
mother," and Green Berry "ran him off." Use your imagination to
imagine what, in 1906, could have caused such an event. Was it the
use of offensive language? Sassing his mother? Slapping his mother?
Disobeying her? Or was it some other sin or transgression that was
socially unacceptable at the time? Your guess is as good as mine, and
we will probably never know the answer.
Emma Dale Holder was the seventh child in the family (1876-1964) and
Brisco was the eighth child (born the next year, 1877). Apparently
these two siblings were very close and it seems she was the only one
with whom he kept in touch over the years.
The family story, at least from my mother (1911-93) and my aunt
(1914-2000) who apparently had it from Emma Dale, was that Brisco
died "in the mid-1920s" in some Midwestern town, perhaps Chicago,
Cincinnati, Columbus, Cleveland, Chillicothe, etc. Boy, this was
certainly a nebulous area to search. With the idea of it having been
a place starting with the letter "C," I was in for an extensive and
wild research journey.
My search has taken me many places in person, including most of the
places that are mentioned above. I've also mined the Web and all the
resources I could imagine, with wild abandon. (It was like looking
for a missing cat in the house: you eventually get desperate and look
in the oven, the microwave, the dryer, and the attic, although those
alternatives are impossible!) It has led me to post messages on
mailing lists and message boards. I have searched military records,
city directories, and a host of other resources in search of Brisco.
Using Ancestry Resources
Ancestry is, without doubt, the most prolific and comprehensive
database site in the world. With more than 25,000 databases in the
U.S., Canada, Australia, the UK, France, Germany, and Italy, it is
the mother lode of genealogical information. Of course, not
everything is there, but there is a huge set of genealogical
information there! Having written the The Official Guide to
Ancestry.com, I really know how to use Ancestry and to search it
with a huge amount of effectiveness!
The World War I Draft Registrations database was the first place I
found Brisco Washington Holder. Without having found him in the 1910
federal census, Brisco's first appearance in any records was in Mason
City, Cerro Gordo County, Iowa, on 12 September 1918 when he
registered for the draft (in the third registration). Further
research with the National Personnel Records Center indicates that he
did not serve in the military in WWI.
I have searched for city directories and all sorts of other record
types at Ancestry, using various search strategies including spelling
variations, location changes and deviations, name reversals,
initials, nicknames, general searches and exact searches, and a vast
number of variants--all of which you have to consider.
The Value of Collaboration
I have been tremendously successful working with the Ancestry message
boards and mailing lists, with uploading my GEDCOM file from my
database into the My Ancestry area, and searching and contacting
other researchers. I won't lie to you; it has been an important part
of my genealogical research to make these contacts and to develop
collaborative relationships and friendships with these wonderful
people.
Finding Brisco at Last!
While the Ancestry resources have been helpful and have given me
hope, you never know where the conclusive clues will come from! Drew
Smith and I are the co-hosts of The Genealogy Guys Podcast each week. One of our listeners, Sherry L.
(surname withheld), sent an e-mail a couple of Saturdays ago that
rocked my genealogical life!
Sherry's e-mail subject line read, "Is This Your Brisco Holder?" I
will save this e-mail forever because, when I opened it, there was a
link to the Missouri Death Certificates, 1910-1956 database. When I
searched for Brisco Holder, I found a link to his death certificate
#17351. He had not died in the 1920s; he had died on 17 May 1949 in
St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, at the age of seventy-two!
Based on his birth date, location, and father's name, this was the
correct person! (His mother's name was incorrect.)
Sherry gave me the greatest genealogical gift of my life, and I
cannot thank her enough! In my next column, I will share with you the
immediate research that the death certificate gave me, the reactions
of the rest of my first cousins--descendants of Elizabeth Holder--
information from other people in the St. Louis area who looked at the
grave for me, and where this takes us from here.
However, as you can see, publication in whatever form and
collaboration with other kind and wonderful genealogists can bring
your research "brick walls" to become something else.
Happy Hunting and Collaborations!
George
George's brand new book, The Official Guide to Ancestry.com, is now
available from his company's website, Aha! Seminars, Inc., personally
autographed by the author! Listen to The Genealogy Guys Podcast each
week for fun, entertaining, and informative genealogy discussions.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| September/October issue of Ancestry Magazine
The September/October issue of Ancestry Magazine is on the
newsstands. Inside you'll learn about unmarked graves and potters'
fields, miners in your family tree, modern people with old-fashioned
businesses, and so much more. Plus, subscribers now get even more:
access to the new Ancestry Magazine—Digital Edition, complete with
digital-exclusive articles that you won't find anywhere else. Click
here to subscribe to Ancestry Magazine at the sale price of $14.95
for a one year subscription. (For a limited time only.)
|
 |
| Tips from the Pros: Is That Obituary Misleading?
from Michael John Neill
Many genealogists use obituaries as a part of their research. They
can easily be a clue to additional records or sources, but must be
used with care. It is important to remember that the information
contained in an obituary can be incorrect, misleading, or incomplete.
The confusion is compounded when an obituary contains all three
errors.
The deceased might have been married three times, but only the last
spouse is listed in the obituary. Children of the deceased may be
named, but they may not have the same set of both parents and none
may be the child of the spouse listed in the obituary. Lists of
children may even be incomplete, especially if there has been a
family squabble or an estrangement.
Individuals listed as children may actually be step-children of the
deceased. The step-parent/step-child bond may have been a very strong
one and the step-parent may have been a parent to the child in all
the important ways, but the obituary may not make the distinction
which the genealogist typically wants to make.
And there can easily be unintentional errors due to inaccurate
knowledge on the part of the obituary informant.
An obituary may be an important part of your genealogical research,
but the information it contains should be used with care and as a
pointer to other records. Many times the obituary's purpose is to
notify newspaper readers of the death and funeral of the deceased.
Those details are usually correct; other details should be used with
caution.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| Your Quick Tips Month-by-Month Scrapbook of Tradition
My parents, born in the early 1900s in Newfoundland, Canada, rarely
talked about their lives growing up. A few years ago, as scrapbooking
came into vogue and with so much info available on the Web, I
thought, "Why not do an album based on the months of the year in my
parents lives?" I loved the project and it took about six months.
Life was very hard for my parents and fishing was paramount, so
weddings, parties, etc. were done in the off-season. I found out what
a wedding entailed and what clothes were worn, etc. I looked at
deaths (viewings at home), and related traditions. They held a
"Mummer's Parade" at Christmas. There were so many traditions that
I'd known nothing about--what their daily life was like, how
important the church was, singing--they loved creating songs--and
having 'kitchen parties.'
I learned so much that I'd never known and recommend this to your
readers.
Carolyn 'Whiffen' Murray
Water Can Make Tombstones Legible
I've found what I think is a very good way to take a picture of a
tombstone without doing it any harm, which is the purpose of
preserving our history. Take two spray bottles and fill them with
plain water; nearby spring or creek water will do well. (I take two
because one might quit spraying while I am out on my mission.) Take a
soft bristle bench brush and lightly brush stone to get particles
off, spray with water, and gently wipe off excess water with cotton
cloth. Water will stick in the low letters and when picture is taken
will stand out very well. I haven't tried with raised letters.
Thanks and good hunting!
Graveyard Junkie,
Steve
Keeping Heirlooms Safe
With the recent floods in so many parts of the country and fires in
others, in addition to the suggestions in George Morgan's article on
computer back-ups,
take a look at the more material aspects of your family history.
Light, dirt, temperature extremes, and humidity are the enemies of
just about everything we have to save, from photographs and old
journals and letters to wedding dresses, quilts, linens, and other
heirlooms. Make sure these valuables are in the safest storage
conditions possible, and take photographs that can be disseminated
amongst other family members or offsite. That way if a disaster were
to claim them, there would still be a record of their existence.
Thanks,
Lou
If you have a suggestion you would like to share with other researchers, send it to: Juliana@Ancestry.com. Thanks to all of this week's contributors!
Quick Tips may be reprinted, with credit to the submitter, in other Ancestry publications, so if you do not want your tip included in a publication other than the Ancestry Weekly Journal please state so clearly in your message.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| The Year Was 1807
The year was 1807 and Europe was embroiled in the Napoleonic Wars. By
this time Napoleon had solidified his hold on Western Europe and
victories to the east, particularly at Friedland, would lead to the
Peace of Tilsit between Russia, Prussia, and France.
Late in 1806, Napoleon had declared that no French and allied ports
should allow trade with its enemy, Great Britain. Denmark was at the
time neutral in the conflict, but Britain feared that it would fall
to Napoleon and with it, the Danish fleet. Britain demanded custody
of the fleet and upon refusal, in early September, began the
bombardment of Copenhagen. After four days of bombing, Denmark
surrendered its fleet of seventeen ships of the line, seventeen
frigates, sixteen smaller vessels, and twenty-six gunboats to
Britain. Denmark sided with France for the remainder of the war.
In March, the U.S. Congress passed "An Act to prohibit the
importation of slaves into any port or place within the jurisdiction
of the United States, from and after the first day of January, in the
year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eight."
Britain followed shortly after with the Slave Trade Act of 1807,
which prohibited British ships from engaging in slave trade and
imposed a fine of £100 per slave.
There was tension between Britain and the United States and that
tension brought the countries closer to war when the H.M.S. Leopard
opened fire on the U.S.S. Chesapeake to forcibly capture four alleged
British deserters. Only one of the captured men was proven to be a
deserter and the attack killed three men and wounded eighteen more.
In response, U.S. President Thomas Jefferson issued a proclamation
ordering British ships out of U.S. territorial waters.
With Britain continuing to impress U.S. sailors into service in the
Royal Navy, Jefferson was pushed to further action. (In early 1808
James Madison reported the number of impressed seamen as 4,028.) In
December, Congress passed the Embargo Act which prohibited all trade
outside U.S. ports. While it manages to temporarily keep the country
out of war, it had little impact on its desired targets and overall
did more harm to U.S. merchants.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| Photo Corner
If you'd like to see your ancestor's photograph in the Ancestry Weekly Journal, send it to Juliana@Ancestry.com.
 |
 |
Contributed by Susan Beyer
This is a photo of my mother, Angela Lacirignola (Beyer), abt. age
three, with her brother, Joseph Lacirignola, abt. age five. The
photo was taken around 1919 in New York City. My mother and her
brother were born in New York City to Italian immigrants.
|
Contributed by Joanie Hanlon
I love this photo of my grandparents, Nellie Morlan Milburn (1881-
1981) and Joseph Enzely Milburn (1876-1962) in the dining room of
their Mystic, Appanoose County, Iowa home, November 1949. The first
thing I thought was, "That's where I got my calves!"
|
> Comment on these photos |
 |
| Product Picks of the Week Your Swedish Roots: A Step-By-Step Handbook
by Per Clemensson and Kjell Andersson
An American searching for his or her Swedish roots has many
advantages, as well as some challenges. Since Sweden has not been at
war for close to two hundred years, Swedish sources and archives are
very extensive and complete. The records are in good order and are
easy to find. In fact, the most commonly used church records are now
even available on the Internet. Guidance for how to access and use
these resources is found in this book.
Normally this book retails for $24.95, but for one week you can buy
it in the Ancestry Store for $19.95.
The Official Guide to Ancestry.com
by George G. Morgan
Whether you are coming to Ancestry.com for the first time or have
used it for years, you need The Official Guide to Ancestry.com.
Written by noted genealogist and lecturer George G. Morgan, this
official guide takes you inside the #1 website for family history
research for an unprecedented tour.
Become more proficient with searching the site. Explore obscure
databases you didn't know existed. Create and develop your own family
tree. You will learn to do all of these things and more in The
Official Guide to Ancestry.com. You've always known Ancestry.com was
a valuable resource. Now you can learn to use it like never before.
Normally this book retails for $24.95, but for one week you can buy it
in the Ancestry Store for $22.45.
|
|
|
 |
|