by Michael John Neill
I recently located testimony that appeared to have been given by my
wife's ancestor in a Revolutionary War pension application. My
excitement over the new discovery was tempered by the realization
that I needed to make certain the person giving testimony was indeed
my wife's ancestor. While it is certainly natural to be excited over
new discoveries, it is important not jump to conclusions. Hasty
research can lead to wasted time, money, and brick walls higher than
the ones we originally had.
The 1847 Revolutionary War pension application for Katharine Blain in
Delaware County, Ohio, contained testimony from a Katharine Wickiser.
My wife's ancestor, Katharine Wickiser, also lived in Delaware County
and both women were about the same age. But before I used the clues
contained in the pension file to further my research, I needed to be
reasonably certain the two women were the same person.
The first step was to review the chronology and family structure I
had compiled for Katharine Wickiser and her husband Abraham.
Comparing the information already located with the information in the
pension testimony would help me in determining if the two Katharines
were one and the same.
Chronologies are such an important tool that we'll briefly discuss
some suggestions for compiling them.
- The chronology should have a specific beginning and end, typically
the birth and death of the focus person or the births and deaths of
the focus set of parents.
- Years of birth and death may have to be estimated for all
individuals who are a part of the chronology.
- Sources for any date estimates should be given and if a "complete"
guess is made, the rationale behind that guess should be noted.
- Complete consistency is not realistic, but a reasonable amount is.
The laws of time and physics should not be suspended to make details
fit.
For more information on creating a timeline, see this step-by-step
guide.
Who Else Has That Name?
Searches should be conducted to determine if there were
contemporaries in the area with the same first and last name. In many
cases individuals of this type are actually related (often named for
the same relative); the problem is determining which documents belong
to which one. Census, tax, and property records are good sources for
this purpose and determining family structure can help distinguish
one person from the other.
A Brief Chronology
Here's a brief chronology of the family:
- 1780 (approximate) Abraham Wickiser born in Pennsylvania
- 1784 (approximate) Katharine [---] Wickiser born in New Jersey
- ca. 1798-1808 Abraham and Katharine marry, probably in Luzerne
County, Pennsylvania, or nearby. (Yes, that's very young for
Katharine, but it's not unheard of.)
Katharine's Testimony
Katharine Wickiser's testimony is contained in the widow's claim for
Katharine Blain, widow of Elam Blain. Her 8 April 1847 testimony
indicates she was living in Delaware County, Ohio. Katharine
indicated she had been acquainted with Elam Blain (and Katharine
Blain) since 1786 and at that time he lived in New Jersey. It also
indicates that Elam moved to Pennsylvania in approximately 1801, then
in 1815 to Muskingum County, Ohio, and from there to Delaware County,
Ohio, in 1822.
Wickiser indicates the Blains were married before she was acquainted
with them. She does not indicate any relationship with the Blains or
whether her migration followed theirs precisely. Since the dates
given are significantly before the 1847 testimony date, they could be
somewhat incorrect.
Comparing the Testimony
The parallels between the details in the testimony and information we
have on our Katharine are interesting. The age of the Katharine
giving testimony is indicated as between sixty and seventy,
approximately the same age as the known Katharine. Since there are no
other Katharine Wickisers in the same area, I'll initially conclude
the two are the same person.
There are actually many more parallels between the chronology of the
Blain family and that of known Katharine Wickiser, indicating a
potential relationship. The date of 1786 (when Katharine first knew
the Blains) is close to her own estimated date of birth (1784),
hinting she has known them her entire life.
Katharine's movements are remarkably consistent with the Blains.
The "known" Katharine Wickiser was born in New Jersey per the 1850
census and most likely met and married her husband Abraham in his
native Pennsylvania. Her own daughter Lucinda was born in Muskingum
County in 1816 and she and her husband purchased property in 1822 in
Delaware County, the same year she indicates the Blain family moved
there.
Lessons
Records for people other than our ancestor may contain vital clues on
our own relatives. This is particularly true of records that may
contain testimony from witnesses with no relationship to the parties
involved, such as pension and court records. The difficulty is in
locating these records as they frequently are not indexed by every
name mentioned. Because of this limitation, current research
techniques for searching these records include looking for pension
and court records of:
- ancestral siblings
- Years of birth and death may have to be estimated for all
individuals who are a part of the chronology.
- neighbors
- associates
For more information on creating a timeline, see this step-by-step
guide.
Who Else Has That Name?
Searches should be conducted to determine if there were
contemporaries in the area with the same first and last name. In many
cases individuals of this type are actually related (often named for
the same relative); the problem is determining which documents belong
to which one. Census, tax, and property records are good sources for
this purpose and determining family structure can help distinguish
one person from the other.
A Brief Chronology
Here's a brief chronology of the family:
- 1780 (approximate) Abraham Wickiser born in Pennsylvania
- 1784 (approximate) Katharine [---] Wickiser born in New Jersey
- ca. 1798-1808 Abraham and Katharine marry, probably in Luzerne
County, Pennsylvania, or nearby. (Yes, that's very young for
Katharine, but it's not unheard of.)
That takes time. However, as we have seen in Katharine's testimony,
our searches are often rewarded.
The last lesson this week is the importance of reading the entire
file or record and not stopping at the first document. Katharine's
testimony was not the only testimony included in the Blain pension
file and that other testimony provided even more information than
Katharine's did. In an upcoming column, we'll see how helpful that
other information was. But it was important first to make certain we
actually had located information on the same Katharine. Jumping to
conclusions can create more problems than it solves.
Michael John Neill is the Course I Coordinator at the Genealogical
Institute of Mid America (GIMA) held annually in Springfield,
Illinois, and is also on the faculty of Carl Sandburg College in
Galesburg, Illinois. Michael is currently a member of the board of
the Federation of Genealogical Societies (FGS). He conducts seminars
and lectures nationally on a wide variety of genealogical and
computer topics and contributes to several genealogical publications,
including "Ancestry" Magazine. You can e-mail him at
mjnrootdig@gmail.com or visit his website at http://www.rootdig.com,
but he regrets that he is unable to assist with personal research.
> Comment on this article