|
Ancestry Daily News
7/20/2007 - Archive
Ancestry Weekly Journal, 23 July 2007
Ancestry Weekly Journal
|
|
|
"Nothing contributes so much to tranquilize the mind as a steady
purpose-a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye."
~ Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, 1797-1851
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Using Ancestry: Tips from the Trail of Tobin Hatters
by Juliana Smith
Yesterday was one of those days where things just fell into place.
Those of you who have been reading my columns for a while may
remember me talking about my Tobin ancestors in past articles. Well,
using passenger arrival records, obituaries, and some more unusual
records, I stumbled upon some startling surprises and got a little
more insight into this line.
The Tobin Hatters
My third great-grandfather, Thomas H. Tobin, was a hatter in New York
City until around 1847 when he moved to Rochester, New York, and
opened a hat shop there. One of my mom's aunts had mentioned that he
also had made a hat for Abraham Lincoln. (A tough story to prove, but
interesting nonetheless.) She also said he had a brother Peter who
was in the hat business, too.
There were several Tobin hatters (Peter, James, and George) that
appeared in New York City directories at that time, and I've always
wondered whether they were related in some way. There were plenty of
similarities, particularly when it came to the areas where they set
up shop, but I hadn't yet organized my notes enough to prove any
connections.
I started by pulling out notebooks with handwritten directory
listings, censuses, and other assorted records I had collected on the
Tobin hatters. I put the handwritten items into electronic format and
organized them chronologically. Doing so brought out some links via
shared addresses between Peter, James, and a William Tobin, who ran a
porterhouse (tavern).
I also had a passenger arrival for four Tobins arriving on the
Robert Isaac in 1841 in the New York Passenger Arrivals, 1820-50: W., age sixty-nine;
Mary, age sixty-three; Geo?, age twenty-three; and Peter, age
sixteen. Considering the difference in ages, it was a stretch to
think that W. and Mary were parents, coming over with sons George and
Peter. (She would have been about fifty-three years old when she had
Peter.) But the ages matched up with two hatters (also George and
Peter) I had found in the census, and since I had found a Mary, age
eighty-six, living with Peter in 1860, I was confident that there was
some relationship.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Sometimes it's Right Under Your Nose
Some of you may have heard a scream around 3:00 last Tuesday
afternoon. Yes, that was me. I thought I'd poke around the New York,
Death Newspaper Extracts, 1801-1890 from the Barber Collection at
Ancestry.com. I thought I had
pretty much scoured this database for all of my family lines, but
apparently this wasn't the case. I ran across a Mary Tobin with a
death date in 1873. I was doubtful that this was our Mary and almost
skipped over it. I'm so glad I didn't. It was a reference to an
obituary in the "Brooklyn Daily Eagle" that read,
Apr 2 Mary Tobin wid Wm hater [sic] 100y sons Peter George James res s
Peter 366 Hudson Ave.
I couldn't believe that it was right there under my nose all this
time. I had assumed that she had died before 1870 because I had
located Peter in 1870, and Mary wasn't living with him at the time.
After all, she had been eighty-six in 1860. This is a good reminder
to keep those assumptions in check!
I pulled up the full obituary of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle from the
Brooklyn Public Library's online collection.
TOBIN. On Wednesday, April 2, 1873, Mary Tobin, widow of William
Tobin, hatter, in the 100th year of her age.
Friends and acquaintances of the family, also those of her sons,
Peter, George, and James are requested to attend the funeral from the
residence of her son, Peter C. Tobin, 366 Hudson av., on Sunday,
April 16, at 2 P.M.
Where's Mary?
Since my mom happened to be in SLC, I called her and gave her the
information I had found. (O.K., I probably wasn't as calm as that
sounds. I believe I actually shrieked for most of the conversation.)
She set out for the Family History Library to look for her death
record. She located Mary in the index, but then we were in for a
letdown. The index gave her certificate number as 144348, but when
she looked for the film number of the certificates, she found that
certificates no. 143581-160000 are missing and were not microfilmed.
Dang!
We didn't give up there though. A search of the 1870 census turned up
a Mary Toben, age ninety-eight, in the 19th Ward, 20th District,
image 116 of 219. She
appeared to be in some sort of institution as she was among a long
list of apparently unrelated people, and there were no headers on the
census pages except for a page number in the upper left corner. On
image 100, there was an enumeration tally page of sorts.
I paged forward and did a double-take. The top of the next page read,
"Penitentiary." This was not where I expected to find my ninety-
eight-year-old 4th great-grandmother! What could she have done to
wind up in the hoosegow?
Browsing through the enumeration, it became evident that this was the
enumeration of Blackwell Island and all of its facilities. Another
tally page further on gave numbers for the almshouse. I scanned my
bookshelves for more information about Blackwell Island. The
description in New York, An Illustrated History, by Ric Burns and
James Sanders with Lisa Ades (Companion to the PBS Series)" reads:
For the tens of thousands of unfortunate people who fell by the
wayside each year, the only recourse was Blackwell's Island--a
forbidding cluster of stone fortresses out in the East River, where
the city's most desperate and dangerous people were confined.
The island's stark facilities--the penitentiary, the workhouse, the
lunatic asylum, the Hospital for Incurables--were routinely filled to
capacity, its two dismal almshouses, one man wrote, crowded with "broken down and decrepit men and women, and old chronic cases, sent
there to die."
Wow. That's a sobering description, and I couldn't help but be moved
by the thought that this could be my ancestor. Tobin is a relatively
common name, but with the age matching so closely, and the fact that
living to that age was the exception, I'm inclined to believe it is.
Not the kind of thing you want to find out in your research, but we
have to take the bad with the good.
The Good News Is...
I also did some searching online for more information about Blackwell
Island and in doing so, have hope that, although finding what may be
my 4th great-grandmother in an almshouse at age ninety-eight was
disheartening, this new discovery may help me to locate more
information to prove or disprove the relationship. The Municipal
Archives of New York
has a collection of Almshouse records dating from 1758-1953. Many of
these records are also available on microfilm at the Family History
Library. (Guess what Mom's doing right now?)
Still Much To Do
While I have definitely have made progress on this line, I also still
have a lot to prove. There are several things still nagging at me:
- Mary's age in relation to her "sons." Fifty-three is pretty old
for a woman to be bearing children, but then again, you have to think
she was probably in good health to have lived that long.
- Why she would be on Blackwell Island in 1870 when clearly Peter
was relatively well off? Was she there because of disease? We may
never know the answer to this one, but perhaps the almshouse records
will help in this aspect.
- Where do the brothers disappear to in various years? I still have
a lot of gaps to fill in my research, and I'll want to branch out
into vital records, probates, and anything else I can get my hands
on.
- Most importantly, the only link I have between this family and my
ancestor, Thomas Tobin, is from that interview with Mom's aunt.
Because what she said has been dead-on so far, I'm inclined to
believe her, but I still need something tangible to prove the
relationship between this family and mine.
Clearly, I need to take this case step-by-step and make sure I'm
covering all the bases, but if the past day has been any indication,
it should be a very interesting ride!
Juliana Smith has been an editor of Ancestry.com newsletters for more
than eight years and is author of The Ancestry Family Historian's
Address Book. She has written for Ancestry Magazine and wrote the
"Computers and Technology" chapter in The Source: A Guidebook to
American Genealogy, rev. 3rd edition. Juliana can be reached by e-
mail at Juliana@Ancestry.com, but she regrets that her schedule does
not allow her to assist with personal research.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| Flip for Footage
by Maureen Taylor
In my mind, summer is the season for home video. Graduations,
recitals, weddings, soccer tournaments, family outings, and vacations
make this a perfect time to take moving images of family milestones.
If you're the average family photographer then you own at least one
home movie recorder. This might be a dedicated video camera or a
digital camera with an MPEG movie feature. My teenage kids take a lot
of short clips using their cell phones.
About five years ago after years of resisting the trend, I finally
purchased a video camera. It uses little tapes that are convenient to
tote around and takes pretty good footage. At the time I thought,
"I'll buy the camera, download the footage, edit it, and share it
with family." It was a statement full of good intentions.
Unfortunately I'm still looking for the right hook-up for my
computer.
You're probably wondering why I'm mentioning my failures as a home
movie enthusiast. Well, recently I just bought a new camera. It
wasn't expensive, and I can either upload footage to my computer
using the internal USB connection or view it on my television. It's a
dream come true for anyone that needs some quick footage. Did I
mention it uses AA batteries and is so easy to operate even little
kids and non-technical elders can "point and shoot." It's called the
Flip. Pure Digital Technologies introduced it at the beginning of May, and it's a sellout at local
stores. Once I saw what it could do, I had to have one. (Pure Digital
sells two versions of the device for less than two hundred dollars;
one records for thirty minutes and the other for sixty minutes.)
The afternoon I bought a Flip, I used it to record my son's drum
recital. All I had to do was turn the camera on, push the red button
on the back, zoom in (it has a 2X zoom) and hold the camera steady.
Then I came home and within a couple of minutes downloaded the
footage to my computer. (My son previewed his performance on the
camera during the ride home.) You don't need extra cables or software
(that's built in). Now that the footage is on my computer, I can make
a DVD or email it to relatives. Of course, since it's digital it's
also ready to be added to my family history software, a family home
page, or for the public on YouTube if I were
so inclined. (I'm not!) The quality of the recording can't compete
with high-end cameras, but you can't beat its simplicity and size. It
fits in a pocket or small purse.
If you've ever thought about using home video to preserve family
history, now's the time.
- Take footage of all your special family moments
- Record an interview with an elderly relative.
- Get the kids involved by asking them to shoot movies at events.
- Share your home videos with family and friends.
Point and shoot devices like the new Flip camera, a digital camera
with movie capabilities, or even cell phones have a place in
preserving family history. Before impulsively pointing the camera,
reflect for a minute or two on what you'd like to capture. These
devices have limited storage space, so you might not get a chance to
record the whole event. Think ahead toward the highlights, and plan
for the important moments worth saving.
There's a family history revolution in the works. Instead of using
pen and paper, more genealogists are turning to digital devices to
tell their family story using pictures, moving images, and audio
recordings. Your descendants won't have to wonder if you had the
dance moves; they'll be able to see you in action and hear you
humming along.
Maureen Taylor writes about family photos in her blog on the website PhotoDetective.com
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| Tips from the Pros: Russian Research
from George G. Morgan
If you are of Russian descent and have encountered little of
substance in the resources on the Internet, you will be pleased to
visit the Researching Russian Roots Site. Here you will find introductory
articles concerning how to start your Russian family history
research, links to message boards, an extensive list of links to
archives in Russia and their mailing/e-mail addresses, details and
links for research in Ukraine and Belarus, some individual family
trees, and a vast compilation of other Web links in the U.S. Some
sites are in Russian (Cyrillic), but most of these offer English
versions as well. If you're researching your Russian roots, don't
miss this site.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| Your Quick Tips Click Through to Next Page
I don't know if you have mentioned this yet as you advertise that the
Iowa State Censuses are available, but I have found that the 1925
year is extremely helpful. This census year asked for the names of
the person's parents (including mother's maiden name), age, and place
where they married. People may miss this valuable information if they
don't click to view the original page where their ancestor is found
on the census. This is a great source of information--thanks for
making it available.
Melissa Mailander Curristan
Unusual Census Spellings
An article about finding unusual spellings in the census reminded me
of an experience. In the 1900 U.S. Census an ancestor's name of
Kubalski was spelled "Cowballski." The same census taker used Smith
for all the Schmidts in his area. This was in Wright County,
Minnesota.
Mabel Loesch
How Many Children Living? An Important Question
I enjoyed your recent article in the Ancestry online newsletter about
spicing up family history by adding interesting details about our
ancestors' lives.
Your tip about using the 1900 and 1910 census info to find the number
of children born to a woman versus the number of those still living
was a good one.
That info in the census was of great help to us as we researched my
mother's maternal side of the family. Before doing research on my
wife's family, we "knew" that her great-grandmother had nine
children, which was not unusual for the late 1800's. But we were
surprised to learn that the 1900 census said she had fourteen, nine
of whom were still alive that year! Upon further research, we learned
from various birth, death, and internment records that she actually
bore 15 children. We found that three of the children had died very
young, 2 of them on the very same day, probably of diphtheria,
although cause of death was not recorded.
We were able to locate birth records for twelve of the children,
(including the fifteenth one who was born after 1900) and presume
that the others, unnamed and unrecorded, died at birth or were
stillborn. Without that census info, we would not have been aware of
the travail that she and her husband must have gone through in losing
so many little ones to early death.
Ed Daniel,
Rockville, Maryland
If you have a suggestion you would like to share with other researchers, send it to: Juliana@Ancestry.com. Thanks to all of this week's contributors!
Quick Tips may be reprinted, with credit to the submitter, in other Ancestry publications, so if you do not want your tip included in a publication other than the Ancestry Weekly Journal please state so clearly in your message.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| The Year Was 1882
The year was 1882 and the United States passed several new laws
regarding immigration, the first of which was the Chinese Exclusion
Act. The
legislation blocked the immigration of Chinese "skilled and unskilled
laborers and Chinese employed in mining" and only allowed entry to
non-laborers who could be certified by the Chinese government that
they were qualified to immigrate. It also required Chinese immigrants
who left the U.S. to obtain certification in order to reenter.
The second piece of legislation, passed in August of 1882, further
excluded "lunatics, idiots, and persons likely to become a public
charge." A fifty cent passenger tax on each person entering U.S.
ports was enacted to defray the cost of immigration regulation.
These restrictions came at a time when the Jewish population began
leaving Russia in response to the newly enacted "May Laws" of 1882.
The May Laws restricted Jewish settlement, forcing many from their
homes, and made it illegal to conduct business on Sundays and
Christian holidays.
In New York City, Thomas Edison opened a power station on Pearl
Street. The station, which provided electricity to one square mile in
Manhattan, was the start of the electric utility industry, and its
success increased the demand for electricity.
Newly emerging technology took a hit in November as a solar storm wreaked havoc on the telegraph industry, causing delays in the
transaction of business. The New York Times of 18 November 1882 reported that "from 9 am
until noon, telegraph business east of the Mississippi and north of
Washington was at a stand-still . . . An aurora borealis was the
first evidence of the overcharging of the atmosphere with electric
fluid." Transmissions
from Europe were also affected, as was the newly developed telephone
system.
> Print or comment on this article |
 |
| Photo Corner
If you'd like to see your ancestor's photograph in the Ancestry Weekly Journal, send it to Juliana@Ancestry.com.
 |
 |
Contributed by Dan Mangan, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
This photograph shows the family of John and Ann Whelan, Irish
immigrants, in Perry, New York, taken in the late 1880s. My
grandmother, Mary Adeline Whelan Mangan, is a young teenager here,
and is seated first row right. |
Contributed by Monte Engel, Devils Lake, North Dakota
The attached photo is of my mother (right), Dolores (Stenso) Engel
and her sister Shirley (Stenso) Sibley. They were about seven and
five years of age in 1935 when this was taken in Drake, North Dakota.
|
> Comment on these photos |
 |
| Product Pick of the Week Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898
by Edwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace
In this epic, Pulitzer Prize-winning work, Edwin G. Burrows and Mike
Wallace describe an epic as vast and varied as the city it
chronicles. Drawing on the work of hundreds of scholars who have
reexamined New York's past, the authors weave together diverse
histories--of sex and sewer systems, finance and architecture,
immigration and politics, poetry and crime--into a single narrative
tapestry that reads like a fast-paced novel.
Readers will relive the tumultuous early years of New Amsterdam under
the Dutch, the Indian wars and Peter Stuyvesant's autocratic regime,
the English conquest, the rise of slave trading and slave revolts,
the invasion and garrisoning of the city during the Revolution. They
will watch New York blossom over the 19th century into the country's
greatest port, leading manufacturing center, preeminent financial
hub, corporate headquarter, and incubator of mass cultural
innovations from vaudeville and baseball to Coney Island and the
department store.
But the real heroes and heroines of Gotham are New Yorkers
themselves, and the authors provide mini-biographies of hundreds of
individuals, ranging from the world famous to the virtually unknown.
The interplay among New York's fiercely heterogeneous citizens was
often abrasive, and Gotham recounts the way clashes between
immigrants and old-timers, rich and poor, and blacks and whites
flamed into fierce street battles like the Civil War draft riots.
Learn more... Normally this book retails for $29.95, but for one week you can buy
it in the Ancestry Store for $25.95.
For more selections like this one, visit the Mid-Atlantic section of the
Ancestry Store.
The Official Guide to RootsWeb.com (Print version)
by Myra Vanderpool Gormley, CG and Tana Pedersen Lord
Twice winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Truman and John Adams,
McCullough returns with the story of the Revolutionary War -- a book
certain to be another landmark in the literature of American history.
In this stirring book, David McCullough tells the intensely human
story of those who marched with General George Washington in the year
of the Declaration of Independence -- when the whole American cause
was riding on their success, without which all hope for independence
would have been dashed and the noble ideals of the Declaration would
have amounted to little more than words on paper.
Based on extensive research in both American and British archives,
1776 is a powerful drama written with extraordinary narrative
vitality. It is the story of Americans in the ranks, men of every
shape, size, and color, farmers, schoolteachers, shoemakers, no-
accounts, and mere boys turned soldiers. And it is the story of the
King's men, the British commander, William Howe, and his highly
disciplined redcoats who looked on their rebel foes with contempt and
fought with a valor too little known.
Normally this book retails for $12.95, but for one week you can buy it
in the Ancestry Store for $9.95. An e-book version is
also available for download for $7.95.
|
|
|
 |
|