Ancestry.com Member Login | My Account | Guest Registry  
Getting Started | Learning Center | Reference | Publications | Articles & Columns

  Learn > Articles & Columns > Daily News > Current Article  

Along Those Lines ...

FEBRUARY 27, 1998
SERIOUS CITATIONS
by George Morgan

A few weeks ago, I wrote an article called Genealgy Orienteering. In that article, I described the process of locating the correct place where records may be maintained. That included using maps and determining what geopolitical organization was responsible for governing the place at the time that records were created.

I received a number of responses to that article. "Along Those Lines ..." , I want to talk to some documentation issues that you, as a serious genealogist, want to address.



WHY DO WE DOCUMENT AND CITE SOURCES?

Genealogy is a methodical study that seeks to document lines of descent of a family or families. In most cases we use written and recorded records. In other cases we may use word of mouth, i.e., family traditions. But what is most important is that we document our research and resources so that someone else can retrace our path more easily. That might include our descendants or, if you're seeking admission to a society such as the D.A.R., it may be a committee of some sort. Ultimately what you want to do is produce a traceable record of what materials/sources you used, where they were obtained, the repositories where materials are stored, and/or any other supporting or corroborating materials you used.

Genealogists have been looked down upon by historians and academicians precisely because so many genealogists do not document their sources or do so sloppily. Genealogy is often pooh-poohed because the efforts of the amateurs are not documented.

If you are reading this column, I believe you are a serious genealogist, committed to supporting your research with scholarly documentation. To that end, I offer this primer on how to document your research and proper formats of citations. Remember .... without documentation, your research will only be considered surmise and speculation.



PLACE NAMES

One of the responses I received to the Genealogy Orienteering article stated, "One of my pet peeves is people who don't include the county, parish or province in their place names." She was absolutely right! What good is it to notate that your great-great grandparents were married in Frankenau in 1844 if you don't know whether it was part of Austria or Hungary at the time or who had jurisdiction over the area? If your other set of great-grandparents were married in Mebane, North Carolina in 1840, in what courthouse would you find their marriage record? Orange or Alamance County?

The point is this: if you are going to the trouble of locating where the records are to be found, you should be documenting it. "Where?" you ask. You should be documenting this information in the following way in your genealogy database program and/or on your pedigree charts:

Louis Bourre and Marie Analisse de La Fontaigne
were married 26 June 1841 in Tregnac (Limousin) France

WIlliam Thomas ALEXANDER and Wilhelmina Gertrude SCHMIDT
were married 15 October 1840 in Mebane (Orange) NC

Note that surnames are in all caps, dates are DD Month Year,
and places are Town (County/Province) State/Country.

If you have obtained specific information about a record's whereabouts, you should note such things as follows:

Source: Marriage record on file at the Orange County Courthouse,
Hillsborough, NC. Marriage Book C, page 102.

Further, if you have obtained a copy of the record, you should make a notation on the back of the record as follows:

Copy obtained 27 February 1998.
Original on file at the Orange County Courthouse,
Hillsborough, NC. Marriage Book C, page 102.

While this seems a lot of work, there will never be a question of its origin or whereabouts again. When I'm documenting such things, I tend to type the material into my genealogy database program and then copy and paste the information to a blank word processor document. I then place the record copy in my printer and print the citation on the back of the record copy. This saves me lots of time and keystrokes.


CITING BOOKS, MAGAZINES AND GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLIES

I'm always locating new information in books and periodicals. I use these items as secondary sources until I can obtain copies of the originals, visit the repository and examine the originals myself, or both. Sometimes I find information in magazine articles. More often I find information in the publications of the genealogical societies to which I belong. What do I do with these?

If I make copies of specific pages of a book for my own use, I'll also make a copy of the title page and the page with publication information. When I get home and have properly evaluated and digested the information, I'll enter relevant data into my genealogy database. At the same time, I enter a bibliographic citation as follows:

Wright, Stuart Thurman. Historical Sketch of Person County.
 Danville, VA: The Womack Press, 1974. Pages 84-85.

I'll copy and paste this, too, into a Word processing document and then print this information on the back of each page that I may have photocopied. In the event that pages get separated later, I can always tell where they belong. (I tend to file these copies in binders organized by the surnames I am researching. You may be using file folders.)

What if you're citing magazine and journal articles? The following format is a good one for you to use.

Oliver, F. Duane. "The Cemeteries of the North Shoreof Fontana Lake in Western North Carolina (Part 2)." The North Carolina Genealogical Society Quarterly. XXIII, No. 3: 298-313. Raleigh: North Carolina Genealogical Society, 1997.

Note:

The title of the article is enclosed in quotation marks, and is followed with the name of the magazine or journal.

In both cases above, it's also wise to add a one-line notation indicating the repository, library, or archive where the material is housed. That makes it easy to locate it again.

Finally, in this age of electronic information on the Internet and on CD-ROM, there is another body of citation style for these electronic resources. Janice Walker at the University of South Florida in Tampa has developed what many consider to be the authoritative citation format. Her excellent Web page for this can be accessed as follows:

http://www.cas.usf.edu/english/walker/mla.html

Using her style, I would cite information about Italy at Cyndi Howells' new Web site as follows:

Howells, Cyndi. "Italy/Italia."Cyndi's List of Sites on the Internet[Online]. 17 February 1998. http://www.cyndislist.com/italy.htm
(20 February 1998).

The format is:

Author's Lastname, Author's Firstname. "Title of Document."Title of the Web Site (if the page you are citing is a secondary page to the main Web page). Version or File Number (if applicable). Date on the Web page or last revision date. URL of the Web site (date you accessed the site).

Note:

Dates are shown as they are in all genealogical references: DD Month Year (ex.; 27 February 1998).

Since Internet information tends to be dynamic and ever changing, and the "here today and gone tomorrow" rule seems to apply to so many sites, I print a copy off. Again, I type the citation into my genealogy database, copy and paste this text into the word processor, and then feed copies into the printer. I now have the bibliographic citation on the back of every printout page and these exactly match the source documentation in my genealogy database.


WHAT YOU ARE LEAVING BEHIND

When you properly document your sources, you provide an easy to follow path for yourself or other researchers to locate the information. Your research takes on the scholarly attributes that it should because, after all, you are a serious genealogist. Right?

Happy hunting!

George


Copyright 1998 George G. Morgan All Rights reserved "Along Those Lines ..." is a weekly feature of the Genealogy Forum on America Online (Keyword: ROOTS). This column was originally published in the Genealogy Forum on America Online. You may send E-mail to AlongLines. George Morgan would like to hear from you but, because of the volume of E-mail, is unable to respond to each letter individually. He also is unable to assist you with your personal genealogical research.


Return to George Morgan Main Page
Return to Columns Main Page

Copyright 1998, 1999, Ancestry.com Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement